IMC Blog  •  September 2026

Why Two Medical Coders May Assign Different Codes to the Same Patient Record

Two coders can review the same patient record and initially choose different codes. Learn how documentation, specificity and review steps help resolve the difference.

An Institute of Medical Coding guide to understanding how accurate documentation supports sound coding decisions.

Where the difference begins

A patient record contains information from several sources: the reason for the visit, history, examination, assessment, orders and discharge documents. A coder may focus on a different part of that record or interpret a phrase differently. The setting and date of service also affect which code set and guidelines apply.

Specificity changes the answer

A diagnosis may describe a broad condition while another note adds its location, laterality, severity or related complication. Those details may support a more specific code. Coders should trace a documented term through the applicable index and tabular instructions rather than choosing a code from a search result alone.

How to resolve a disagreement

Compare the complete documentation, identify the exact term or conflicting detail, review the current code-set instructions and follow the organization’s coding policy. When the clinical documentation remains unclear, seek an appropriate provider clarification. Never add clinical details that the record does not support.

What beginners can practice

Give two learners the same de-identified case and ask each to record the diagnosis phrase, code pathway and reason for selection. Discuss the evidence for each choice. This makes coding accuracy a process that can be checked, rather than a guess based on memory.

← View all IMC articles
whatsapp icon